The data collected in the 2004 Citizen Satisfaction survey was used to determine drivers of citizen satisfaction.

This is the fourth Prince William County survey to use the alternating-questions survey format. This format implemented in January 2001 by the County government and CSR staff to control survey length contains core questions to be asked each year and two sets of questions included in the survey in alternate years. The purpose of this year's survey was to assess citizen satisfaction with services offered in the County to compare satisfaction levels with those reported in previous survey and to continue annual measurement of overall perception of quality of life in Prince William County.

A re-sample study to assess whether there was measurable non-response bias in the 2003 Innovative Surgery study. The questionnaire used for this study was an exact replication of the original questionnaire. The instrument contained questions about surgeons' opinions concerning innovative or experimental surgery. Responses of the new respondents were compared to those who responded originally.

Questionnaires were made available to attendees at the annual AMSA conference. The University of Virginia's Center for Survey Research received the responses gathered from that event and tabulated them. Three different evaluation surveys were utilized one for Student Leader Evaluation another for Area Health Education Centers and the last for NHSC Ambassador Evaluations.

The consulting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP was selected to carry out the Nonprofit Organizational Development Initiative which was funded by the Fairfax County Department of Housing and Community Development. The overarching objective of the initiative was to ensure that nonprofit organizations receiving funding through the County’s Consolidated Community Funding Pool are capable of providing services in the most effective and efficient manner practicable. As the project approached its completion date Clifton Gunderson asked the Center for Survey Research to assist them in evaluating the various aspects of the project as well as its success in meeting the initiative's overall objectives. The evaluation has two components focus groups with a small number of initiative participants and a web-based survey of executive officers of the targeted organizations.

CSR analyzed data from questionnaires collected from first year students at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration. The questionnaire was designed by a student committee.

Questionnaires were made available to attendees at the annual AMSA conference. The University of Virginia's Center for Survey Research received the responses gathered from that event and tabulated them. Three different evaluation surveys were utilized one for Student Leader Evaluation another for Area Health Education Centers and the last for NHSC Ambassador Evaluations.

CSR analyzed data from questionnaires collected from second year students at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration. The questionnaire was designed by a student committee.

Questionnaires were made available to attendees at the annual AMSA conference. The University of Virginia's Center for Survey Research received the responses gathered from that event and tabulated them. Three different evaluation surveys were utilized one for Student Leader Evaluation another for Area Health Education Centers and the last for NHSC Ambassador Evaluations.

Questionnaires were made available to attendees at the annual AMSA conference. The University of Virginia's Center for Survey Research received the responses gathered from that event and tabulated them. Three different evaluation surveys were utilized one for Student Leader Evaluation another for Area Health Education Centers and the last for NHSC Ambassador Evaluations.

Mail and telephone surveys of Virginia adults to determine their preferences in seeking and receiving health-related information. The results were analyzed with market-segmentation methods to identify key groups with similar preferences.

CSR conducted a timing study of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) transactions in Customer Service Centers (CSC) that was designed to obtain estimates of the mean time required for CSC transactions identified as key cost drivers. Eighteen different transactions were timed by field study personnel and road tests were timed by self-timing methodology.

Client satisfaction study conducted between July and October 2005. Questionnaires were sent to 2 000 DSS clients randomly selected from a list of all DSS clients. Of the 2 000 questionnaires mailed 1 825 had valid addresses. Completed questionnaires were received from 663 respondents for a net response rate of 36.3%.

The purpose of this survey was to determine the strengths and weaknesses in the regulatory processes that relate to construction and development in Prince William County. In its overall approach and focus the 2004 survey largely replicated the project conducted in 2000. However for the 2004 project the County decided to add a counter exit survey to the project as a third component. This was an on-site survey of permit runners residents and other cus-tomers at the counters pertaining to zoning building permit land development permit building plan intake watershed and the fire.

CSR worked with representatives of ASAP the Piedmont Environmental Council and Citizens for Albemarle to develop a questionnaire for possible use in a telephone survey of Albemarle County and area residents. The survey is to focus on growth and development issues and the draft questionnaire was circulated for comment among selected community leaders with a variety of points of view on these issues.

Seventh annual statewide customer satisfaction survey for users of the Department of Motor Vehicles services. The purpose of the 2003 survey was to compare performance ratings with prior years assess DMV users' overall levels of satisfaction with DMV services compare the levels of DMV users' satisfaction across DMV districts analyze the key factors that determine satisfaction level as well as evaluate the new self-service areas available at some customer service centers.

This survey is designed to gather information from individuals recovering from substance abuse problems that employ either the predominant 12-step approach or that of an alternative abstinence based peer support group. The survey was anonymous and distribution of surveys and reminders was via the group coordinators who were contacted by CSR or Dr. Atkins. The goal is to develop a prototype of a treatment assessment tool the Treatment Assessment for Personal Empowerment (T.A.P.E.) measure based on data analysis and scale evaluation. The tool will be designed to provide the best possible client / support group match per treatment approach and aftercare.

This study explores how residents of the National Capital Region (NCR) might respond to potential acts of terrorism and assesses their willingness to practice "community shielding " a wider form of shelter-in-place. Hypothetical scenarios considered by respondents included a "dirty bomb" and an outbreak of smallpox.

A citizen satisfaction survey for the Reston Community Center (RCC) in Reston Virginia. The purpose was to assess citizen opinion on several matters of interest to the Board of Governors of the RCC. A similar survey was conducted in 2001.

The first survey of this kind was conducted by the Center for Survey Research (CSR) in 2001. The main body of the questionnaire from 2001 was used with the addition of new sections on work values and department ratings. The core questionnaire included a series of questions about the services in each department primarily focusing on issues of quality timeliness and overall satisfaction and two questions to determine the employees’ length of service with the City and the department in which they work.